Dear convert-me.com forum visitors,

Our forum has been available for many years. In September 2014 we decided to switch it to read-only mode. Month after month we saw less posts with questions and answers from real people and more spam posts. We were spending more and more resources cleaning the spam until there were less them 1 legitimate message per 100 spam posts. Then we decided it's time to stop.

All the posts in the forum will be available and searchable. We understand there are a lot of useful information and we aren't going to remove anything. As for the new questions, you can always ask them on convert-me.com FaceBook page

Thank you for being with us and sorry for any inconveniences this could caused.

3 posts
• Page **1** of **1**

I would like to place 8million 1 millimeter beads in a baby bottle. How large would the bottle have to be to contianthe beads?

- jc

jc wrote:I would like to place 8million 1 millimeter beads in a baby bottle. How large would the bottle have to be to contianthe beads?

It would have to be a big, strong baby to lift the bottle. I get about 5.66 L.

You may wish to read the Wikipedia article on "close packing" (Google for it)

The volume of one sphere is (4*pi/3)*rÂ³ or (pi/6)*dÂ³, using the diameter.

In an optimium lattice structure, close-packed spheres will occupy pi/sqrt(18) of the volume. This is only true for the lattice shape and any practical package will have minor errors at the walls (as long as minimum dimensions are several times the sphere dimension).

Thus (pi/sqrt(18))*Vc = (pi/6)*n*dÂ³

and Vc = (0.5*sqrt(2))*n*dÂ³

This is 4*sqrt(2)*10^(-3) mÂ³ or 4*sqrt(2) liters. While this evaluates to 5.6585. . . liters, I would recommend rounding up at least to 5.66 L to allow for wall effects.

- Guest

My answer above assumes the beads are carefully packed in optimum arrange. There is another topic "random close packing" when spheres are not ordered, but "dumped" in and then tapped or vibrated to settle them as much as possible.

Apparently in that case, the packing factor is only 64% and that is the limit with adequate vibration (it can be less). Using 64%, I get 6.55 L

Apparently in that case, the packing factor is only 64% and that is the limit with adequate vibration (it can be less). Using 64%, I get 6.55 L

- Guest

3 posts
• Page **1** of **1**